Nanotoxicology of Pharmaceutical Nanocarriers: Molecular Mechanisms, Safety Assessment, Regulatory Challenges and Future Perspectives: A Comprehensive Review
Authors
-
Amar M. Raval
Department of Pharmaceutics, Sharda School of Pharmacy, Pethapur, Gandhinagar, Gujarat Technological University, Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India
-
Kajal M. Doshi
-
Astha Suthar
- Divyaben Rajendrakumar Shah K.B. Raval College of Pharmacy, Shertha, Gandhinagar-382423, Gujarat Technological University, Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India
-
Vidhi Mehra
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.68163/ptr.2026.57Keywords:
Drug delivery systems, nanomedicine, nanotoxicology, pharmaceutical nanocarriers, regulatory toxicology, safety assessmentAbstract
Pharmaceutical nanocarriers have revolutionized drug delivery by enhancing drug solubility, improving bioavailability, enabling targeted delivery and reducing systemic toxicity. Nanocarrier platforms, including liposomes, polymeric nanoparticles, solid lipid nanoparticles, nanostructured lipid carriers, dendrimers, metallic nanoparticles and other nanoscale delivery systems, have demonstrated considerable therapeutic potential across a broad spectrum of diseases, including cancer, infectious, cardiovascular, neurological and inflammatory disorders. Despite these advances, increasing evidence indicates that the unique physicochemical characteristics of nanocarriers, including particle size, morphology, surface charge, composition and surface functionalization, may trigger unintended biological interactions and adverse toxicological responses. Consequently, comprehensive nanotoxicological evaluation has become a fundamental prerequisite for the safe development, regulatory approval and clinical translation of nanomedicines. This review critically examines the molecular mechanisms underlying nanocarrier-induced toxicity, summarizes current in vitro, in vivo and emerging alternative approaches for nanotoxicity assessment, evaluates the influence of physicochemical properties on biological safety and discusses current regulatory frameworks, existing challenges and future perspectives for the safe and sustainable development of pharmaceutical nanocarriers. A comprehensive literature review was conducted using peer-reviewed publications retrieved from PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Embase and Google Scholar. Relevant studies published primarily between 2010 and 2026 were identified using predefined search terms related to nanotoxicology, pharmaceutical nanocarriers, drug delivery systems, safety assessment, regulatory toxicology, oxidative stress, immunotoxicity and nanomedicine. Original research articles, systematic reviews, meta-analyses, regulatory guidance documents and authoritative reports were critically appraised and synthesized to provide a comprehensive overview of current knowledge. Current evidence indicates that nanotoxicity results from complex interactions between nanocarrier physicochemical properties and biological systems. Oxidative stress, excessive reactive oxygen species generation, mitochondrial dysfunction, lysosomal destabilization, DNA damage, inflammation, apoptosis, autophagy, ferroptosis and immune dysregulation have been identified as the principal mechanisms underlying nanocarrier-induced toxicity. These molecular events may lead to organ-specific adverse effects involving the liver, kidneys, lungs, cardiovascular system, nervous system and reproductive organs, with their severity influenced by nanocarrier composition, particle characteristics, dose, exposure duration and route of administration. Emerging technologies, including three-dimensional cell culture models, organ-on-a-chip platforms, high-content imaging, multi-omics approaches and artificial intelligence-driven predictive toxicology, are enhancing the mechanistic understanding, predictive accuracy and translational relevance of nanotoxicity assessment. Nevertheless, significant challenges remain, including the lack of standardized testing methodologies, limited interlaboratory reproducibility, insufficient long-term safety data and incomplete global regulatory harmonization. Pharmaceutical nanocarriers represent a cornerstone of precision medicine; however, their successful clinical translation requires rigorous, standardized and mechanism-based safety evaluation. Integrating mechanistic nanotoxicology, advanced predictive technologies, safe-by-design principles and internationally harmonized regulatory frameworks will be critical for maximizing therapeutic efficacy while minimizing potential risks. Continued interdisciplinary collaboration, technological innovation and evidence-based regulatory development are expected to accelerate the safe and sustainable advancement of next-generation nanomedicines.Downloads
References
Farokhzad OC, Langer R. Impact of nanotechnology on drug delivery. ACS Nano. 2009;3(1):16-20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/nn900002m
Peer D, Karp JM, Hong S, Farokhzad OC, Margalit R, Langer R. Nanocarriers as an emerging platform for cancer therapy. Nat Nanotechnol. 2007;2(12):751-760. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nnano.2007.387
Nel AE, Mädler L, Velegol D, Xia T, Hoek EMV, Somasundaran P, et al. Understanding biophysicochemical interactions at the nano-bio interface. Nat Mater. 2009;8(7):543-557. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nmat2442
Oberdörster G. Safety assessment for nanotechnology and nanomedicine: concepts of nanotoxicology. J Intern Med. 2010;267(1):89-105. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2796.2009.02187.x
Cedervall T, Lynch I, Lindman S, Berggård T, Thulin E, Nilsson H, et al. Understanding the nanoparticle-protein corona using methods to quantify exchange rates and affinities of proteins for nanoparticles. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007;104(7):2050-2055. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0608582104
Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG; PRISMA Group. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med. 2009;6(7):e1000097. 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097
Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ. 2021;372:n71. 10.1136/bmj.n71. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71
Albanese A, Tang PS, Chan WCW. The effect of nanoparticle size, shape, and surface chemistry on biological systems. Annu Rev Biomed Eng. 2012;14:1-16. 10.1146/annurev-bioeng-071811-150124. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-bioeng-071811-150124
Bangham AD, Standish MM, Watkins JC. Diffusion of univalent ions across the lamellae of swollen phospholipids. J Mol Biol. 1965;13(1):238-252. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-2836(65)80093-6
Allen TM, Cullis PR. Liposomal drug delivery systems: from concept to clinical applications. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2013;65(1):36-48. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addr.2012.09.037
Sercombe L, Veerati T, Moheimani F, Wu SY, Sood AK, Hua S. Advances and challenges of liposome assisted drug delivery. Front Pharmacol. 2015;6:286. 10.3389/fphar.2015.00286. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2015.00286
Hou X, Zaks T, Langer R, Dong Y. Lipid nanoparticles for mRNA delivery. Nat Rev Mater. 2021;6(12):1078-1094. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41578-021-00358-0
Szebeni J. Complement activation-related pseudoallergy: a new class of drug-induced acute immune toxicity. Toxicology. 2005;216(2-3):106-121. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tox.2005.07.023
Szebeni J, Simberg D, González-Fernández Á, Barenholz Y, Dobrovolskaia MA. Roadmap and strategy for overcoming infusion reactions to nanomedicines. Nat Nanotechnol. 2018;13(12):1100-1108. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41565-018-0273-1
Lonez C, Vandenbranden M, Ruysschaert JM. Cationic lipids activate intracellular signaling pathways. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2012;64(15):1749-1758. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addr.2012.05.009
Bulbake U, Doppalapudi S, Kommineni N, Khan W. Liposomal formulations in clinical use: an updated review. Pharmaceutics. 2017;9(2):12. 10.3390/pharmaceutics9020012. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics9020012
Danhier F, Ansorena E, Silva JM, Coco R, Le Breton A, Préat V. PLGA-based nanoparticles: an overview of biomedical applications. J Control Release. 2012;161(2):505-522. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jconrel.2012.01.043
Kumari A, Yadav SK, Yadav SC. Biodegradable polymeric nanoparticles based drug delivery systems. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces. 2010;75(1):1-18. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfb.2009.09.001
Kamaly N, Yameen B, Wu J, Farokhzad OC. Degradable controlled-release polymers and polymeric nanoparticles: mechanisms of controlling drug release. Chem Rev. 2016;116(4):2602-2663. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.5b00346
Makadia HK, Siegel SJ. Poly lactic-co-glycolic acid (PLGA) as biodegradable controlled drug delivery carrier. Polymers. 2011;3(3):1377-1397. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/polym3031377
Nel A, Xia T, Mädler L, Li N. Toxic potential of materials at the nanolevel. Science. 2006;311(5761):622-627. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1114397
Müller RH, Mäder K, Gohla S. Solid lipid nanoparticles (SLN) for controlled drug delivery: a review of the state of the art. Eur J Pharm Biopharm. 2000;50(1):161-177. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0939-6411(00)00087-4
Mehnert W, Mäder K. Solid lipid nanoparticles: production, characterization and applications. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2001;47(2-3):165-196. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-409X(01)00105-3
Mukherjee S, Ray S, Thakur RS. Solid lipid nanoparticles: a modern formulation approach in drug delivery system. Indian J Pharm Sci. 2009;71(4):349-358. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/0250-474X.57282
Doktorovova S, Souto EB, Silva AM. Nanotoxicology applied to solid lipid nanoparticles and nanostructured lipid carriers: a systematic review of in vitro data. Eur J Pharm Biopharm. 2014;87(1):1-18. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpb.2014.02.005
Paliwal R, Paliwal SR, Kenwat R, Kurmi BD, Sahu MK. Solid lipid nanoparticles: a review on recent perspectives and patents. Expert Opin Ther Pat. 2020;30(3):179-194. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13543776.2020.1720649
Müller RH, Shegokar R, Keck CM. 20 years of lipid nanoparticles (SLN & NLC): present state of development and industrial applications. Curr Drug Discov Technol. 2011;8(3):207-227. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2174/157016311796799062
Beloqui A, Solinís MÁ, Rodríguez-Gascón A, Almeida AJ, Préat V. Nanostructured lipid carriers: promising drug delivery systems for future clinics. Nanomedicine. 2016;12(1):143-161. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nano.2015.09.004
Ghasemiyeh P, Mohammadi-Samani S. Solid lipid nanoparticles and nanostructured lipid carriers as novel drug delivery systems: applications, advantages and disadvantages. Res Pharm Sci. 2018;13(4):288-303. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/1735-5362.235156
Svenson S, Tomalia DA. Dendrimers in biomedical applications: reflections on the field. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2005;57(15):2106-2129. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addr.2005.09.018
Chauhan AS. Dendrimers for drug delivery. Molecules. 2018;23(4):938. 10.3390/molecules23040938. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules23040938
Jain K, Kesharwani P, Gupta U, Jain NK. Dendrimer toxicity: let's meet the challenge. Int J Pharm. 2010;394(1-2):122-142. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpharm.2010.04.027
Kwon GS, Kataoka K. Block copolymer micelles as long-circulating drug vehicles. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2012;64:237-245. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addr.2012.09.016
Lu Y, Park K. Polymeric micelles and alternative nanonized delivery vehicles for poorly soluble drugs. Int J Pharm. 2013;453(1):198-214. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpharm.2012.08.042
Slowing II, Vivero-Escoto JL, Wu CW, Lin VSY. Mesoporous silica nanoparticles as controlled release drug delivery and gene transfection carriers. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2008;60(11):1278-1288. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addr.2008.03.012
Tang F, Li L, Chen D. Mesoporous silica nanoparticles: synthesis, biocompatibility and drug delivery. Adv Mater. 2012;24(12):1504-1534. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201104763
Mamaeva V, Sahlgren C, Lindén M. Mesoporous silica nanoparticles in medicine: recent advances. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2013;65(5):689-702. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addr.2012.07.018
Napierska D, Thomassen LC, Lison D, Martens JA, Hoet PH. The nanosilica hazard: another variable entity. Part Fibre Toxicol. 2010;7(1):39. 10.1186/1743-8977-7-39. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1743-8977-7-39
Croissant JG, Fatieiev Y, Almalik A, Khashab NM. Mesoporous silica and organosilica nanoparticles: physical chemistry, biosafety, delivery strategies, and biomedical applications. Adv Healthc Mater. 2018;7(4):1700831. 10.1002/adhm.201700831. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/adhm.201700831
Bianco A, Kostarelos K, Prato M. Applications of carbon nanotubes in drug delivery. Curr Opin Chem Biol. 2005;9(6):674-679. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cbpa.2005.10.005
Liu Z, Robinson JT, Sun X, Dai H. Graphene and graphene oxide: synthesis, properties, and applications in biomedical engineering. Adv Mater. 2011;23(32):H36-H65.
Yang K, Feng L, Shi X, Liu Z. Nano-graphene in biomedicine: theranostic applications. Chem Soc Rev. 2013;42(2):530-547. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1039/C2CS35342C
Donaldson K, Poland CA, Murphy FA, MacFarlane M, Chernova T, Schinwald A. Pulmonary toxicity of carbon nanotubes and asbestos: similarities and differences. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2013;65(15):2078-2086. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addr.2013.07.014
Poland CA, Duffin R, Kinloch I, Maynard A, Wallace WA, Seaton A, et al. Carbon nanotubes introduced into the abdominal cavity of mice show asbestos-like pathogenicity in a pilot study. Nat Nanotechnol. 2008;3(7):423-428. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nnano.2008.111
Fadeel B, Bussy C. 2D graphene-based nanomaterials: toxicity, mechanisms, and biomedical design. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2021;175:113819. 10.1016/j.addr.2021.05.030.
Larsen MT, Kuhlmann M, Hvam ML, Howard KA. Albumin-based drug delivery: harnessing nature to cure disease. Mol Cell Ther. 2016;4:3. 10.1186/s40591-016-0048-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40591-016-0048-8
Desai N. Nanoparticle albumin-bound paclitaxel (Abraxane®). In: Otagiri M, Chuang V, editors. Albumin in medicine. Singapore: Springer; 2016. 10.1007/978-981-10-2116-9_6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-2116-9_6
Murphy G, Brayden DJ, Cheung DL, Liew A, Fitzgerald M, Pandit A. Albumin-based delivery systems: recent advances, challenges, and opportunities. J Control Release. 2025;380:375-395. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jconrel.2025.01.035
Jomova K, Raptova R, Alomar SY, Alwasel SH, Nepovimova E, Kuca K, et al. Reactive oxygen species, toxicity, oxidative stress, and antioxidants: chronic diseases and aging. Arch Toxicol. 2023;97(10):2499-2574. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00204-023-03562-9
Mohammadinejad R, Moosavi MA, Tavakol S, Vardar DÖ, Hosseini A, Rahmati M, et al. Necrotic, apoptotic and autophagic cell fates triggered by nanoparticles. Autophagy. 2019;15(1):4-33. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15548627.2018.1509171
de Almeida MS, Susnik E, Drasler B, Taladriz-Blanco P, Petri-Fink A, Rothen-Rutishauser B. Understanding nanoparticle endocytosis to improve targeting strategies in nanomedicine. Chem Soc Rev. 2021;50(9):5397-5434. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1039/D0CS01127D
Smith SA, Selby LI, Johnston APR, Such GK. The endosomal escape of nanoparticles: toward more efficient cellular delivery. Bioconjug Chem. 2019;30(2):263-272. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.bioconjchem.8b00732
Jiang X, Wang X. Cytochrome c-mediated apoptosis. Annu Rev Biochem. 2004;73:87-106. 10.1146/annurev.biochem.73.011303.073706. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.biochem.73.011303.073706
Jackson SP, Bartek J. The DNA-damage response in human biology and disease. Nature. 2009;461(7267):1071-1078. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nature08467
Monopoli MP, Åberg C, Salvati A, Dawson KA. Biomolecular coronas provide the biological identity of nanosized materials. Nat Nanotechnol. 2012;7(12):779-786. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nnano.2012.207
Manaia EB, Abuçafy MP, Chiari-Andréo BG, Silva BL, Oshiro Junior JA, Chiavacci LA, et al. Physicochemical characterization of drug nanocarriers. Int J Nanomedicine. 2017;12:4991-5011. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2147/IJN.S133832
Shinde RB, Veerapandian M. State-of-the-art bio-assay systems and electrochemical approaches for nanotoxicity assessment. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2020;8:325. 10.3389/fbioe.2020.00325. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2020.00325
Ingber DE. Human organs-on-chips for disease modelling, drug development and personalized medicine. Nat Rev Genet. 2022;23(8):467-491. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41576-022-00466-9
US Food and Drug Administration. Drug products, including biological products, that contain nanomaterials: guidance for industry. Silver Spring (MD): Center for Drug Evaluation and Research; 2022. Available from: https://www.fda.gov/regulatory-information/search-fda-guidance-documents/drug-products-including-biological-products-contain-nanomaterials-guidance-industry
European Medicines Agency. Guideline on the data requirements for intravenous liposomal products developed with reference to an innovator liposomal product (EMA/CHMP/806058/2009/Rev. 02). Amsterdam: European Medicines Agency; 2013. Available from: https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/data-requirements-intravenous-liposomal-products-developed-reference-innovator-liposomal-product-scientific-guideline
International Council for Harmonisation of Technical Requirements for Pharmaceuticals for Human Use. ICH guidelines [Internet]. Geneva: ICH; 2026 [cited 2026 Aug 12]. Available from: https://www.ich.org/resources/guidelines
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Amar M. Raval, Kajal M. Doshi, Astha Suthar, Divyaben Rajendrakumar Shah, Vidhi Mehra
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
